'president Let'em ALL IN Joe' Biden AND The United States Congress REFUSE To Enforce the U.S. Constitution ALLOWING AN INVASION by Illegal Aliens Of The United States, 29JUL22 . . .
Webster Dictionary Definition -- Invade (Invasion): To encroach upon, to infringe (Infringe: To encroach upon in a way that violates law or the rights of another). Encroach (Encroach: To enter by gradual steps or by stealth into the possessions or rights of another (HERE U.S. Citizens rights are given to Illegal Aliens that have no lawful right to even be in the United States of America to begin with.); to advance beyond the usual or proper limits). Example: When tourists invade, the town is a very different place. (Replace tourists with Illegal Alien.)
We keep being told that the President of the United States as Commander in Chief of the Military has the right, obligation under the U.S. Constitution to enforce Immigration Policy. Yes, PARTIALLY true, he does; what is NOT being told that regardless of whether the President of the United States does his Constitutional duty, that Congress has the expressed right, duty to prevent Invasion of the United States of America as declared in the United States Constitution. Neither group, the President nor Congress are doing their duty; Congress specifically is not doing that which is expressly written as their responsibility under the U.S. Constitution, and in NOT doing so is abdicating their Constitutional Duty and Responsibility, as has the President that initiated the Border Crisis allowing millions of Illegal Aliens to invade the United States of America (under his pretend "humanitarian aid" in the first place, both groups guilty of not doing their duty, their responsibility under the Constitution WHICH IS a High Crime equivalent to treason ). High Crimes (such as treason,) is NOT a statutory crime. High Crimes, according to the Constitution of the United States are those equivalent to treason, and Misdemeanors are those such as bribery. However, these are not limited to just treason or bribery, but like crimes against the country.
"High," in the legal and common parlance of the 17th and 18th centuries of "high crimes," is activity by or against those who have special duties acquired by taking an oath of office that are not shared with common persons. A high crime, therefore, is one that can be done only by someone in a unique position of authority, which is political in character, who does things to circumvent justice. The phrase "high crimes and misdemeanors," used together, was a common phrase when the U.S. Constitution was written and did not require any stringent or difficult criteria for determining guilt but meant the opposite. The phrase was historically used to cover a very broad range of crimes.
Meaning of "High Crimes and Misdemeanors"
by Jon Roland, Constitution Society
The question of impeachment turns on the meaning of the phrase in the Constitution at Art. II Sec. 4, "Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors". I have carefully researched the origin of the phrase "high crimes and misdemeanors" and its meaning to the Framers, and found that the key to understanding it is the word "high". It does not mean "more serious". It refers to those punishable offenses that only apply to high persons, that is, to public officials, those who, because of their official status, are under special obligations that ordinary persons are not under, and which could not be meaningfully applied or justly punished if committed by ordinary persons.
Under the English common law tradition, crimes were defined through a legacy of court proceedings and decisions that punished offenses not because they were prohibited by statutes, but because they offended the sense of justice of the people and the court. Whether an offense could qualify as punishable depended largely on the obligations of the offender, and the obligations of a person holding a high position meant that some actions, or inactions, could be punishable if he did them, even though they would not be if done by an ordinary person.
Offenses of this kind survive today in the Uniform Code of Military Justice. It recognizes as punishable offenses such things as refusal to obey orders, abuse of authority, dereliction of duty, moral turpitude, and conduct unbecoming. These would not be offenses if committed by a civilian with no official position, but they are offenses which bear on the subject's fitness for the duties he holds, which he is bound by oath or affirmation to perform.
Perjury is usually defined as "lying under oath". That is not quite right. The original meaning was "violation of one's oath (or affirmation)".
The word "perjury" is usually defined today as "lying under oath about a material matter", but that is not its original or complete meaning, which is "violation of an oath". We can see this by consulting the original Latin from which the term comes. From An Elementary Latin Dictionary, by Charlton T. Lewis (1895), Note that the letter "j" is the letter "i" in Latin.
periurium, i, n,, a false oath, perjury.
periurus, adj., oath-breaking, false to vows, perjured. iuro, avi, atus, are, to swear, take an oath.
iurator, oris, m., a swearer.
iuratus, adj., sworn under oath, bound by an oath.
ius, iuris, that which is binding, right, justice, duty.
per, ... IV. Of means or manner, through, by, by means of, ... under pretense of, by the pretext of, ....
By Art. II Sec. 1 Cl. 8, the president must swear: "I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States." He is bound by this oath in all matters until he leaves office. No additional oath is needed to bind him to tell the truth in anything he says, as telling the truth is pursuant to all matters except perhaps those relating to national security. Any public statement is perjury if it is a lie, and not necessary to deceive an enemy.
When a person takes an oath (or affirmation) before giving testimony, he is assuming the role of an official, that of "witness under oath", for the duration of his testimony. That official position entails a special obligation to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, and in that capacity, one is punishable in a way he would not be as an ordinary person not under oath. Therefore, perjury is a high crime.
An official such as the president does not need to take a special oath to become subject to the penalties of perjury. He took an oath, by Art. II Sec. 1 Cl. 8, to "faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States" and to "preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States" to the best of his ability. While he holds that office, he is always under oath, and lying at any time constitutes perjury if it is not justified for national security.
Independent Counsel Kenneth Starr erred in presenting in his referral only those offenses which could be "laid at the feet" of the president. He functioned like a prosecutor of an offense against criminal statutes that apply to ordinary persons and are provable by the standards of "proof beyond a reasonable doubt". That is not to say that such offenses are not also high crimes or misdemeanors when committed by an official bound by oath. Most such offenses are. But "high crimes and misdemeanors" also includes other offenses, applicable only to a public official, for which the standard is "preponderance of evidence". Holding a particular office of trust is not a right, but a privilege, and removal from such office is not a punishment. Disablement of the right to hold any office in the future would be a punishment, and therefore the standards of "proof beyond a reasonable doubt" would apply before that ruling could be imposed by the Senate.
It should be noted, however, that when an offense against a statute is also a "high crime or misdemeanor", it may be, and usually is, referred to by a different name, when considered as such. Thus, an offense like "obstruction of justice" or "subornation of perjury" may become "abuse of authority" when done by an official bound by oath. As such it would be grounds for impeachment and removal from office, but would be punishable by its statutory name once the official is out of office.
An executive official is ultimately responsible for any failures of his subordinates and for their violations of the oath he and they took, which means violations of the Constitution and the rights of persons (former President Harry Truman's "The Buck Stops Here!")
It is not necessary to be able to prove that such failures or violations occurred at his instigation or with his knowledge, to be able, in Starr's words, to "lay them at the feet" of the president. It is sufficient to show, on the preponderance of evidence, that the president was aware of misconduct on the part of his subordinates, or should have been, and failed to do all he could to remedy the misconduct, including termination and prosecution of the subordinates and compensation for the victims or their heirs. According to this, heads should have rolled with the Afghanistan debacle, many of the top civilian and military personnel should have been fired, relieve of their duty, their command by the President, Austin, Milley, McKenzie, etc . . . ! The president's subordinates include everyone in the executive branch, and their agents and contractors. It is not limited to those over whom he has direct supervision. He is not protected by "plausible deniability". He is legally responsible for everything that everyone in the executive branch is doing.
Therefore, the appropriate subject matter for an impeachment and removal proceeding is the full range of offenses against the Constitution and against the rights of persons committed by subordinate officials and their agents which have not been adequately investigated or remedied. The massacre at Waco, the assault at Ruby Ridge, and many, many other illegal or excessive assaults by federal agents, and the failure of the president to take action against the offenders, is more than enough to justify impeachment and removal from office on grounds of dereliction of duty. To these we could add the many suspicious incidents that indicate covered up crimes by federal agents, including the suspicious deaths of persons suspected of being knowledgeable of wrongdoing by the president or others in the executive branch, or its contractors.
The impeachment and removal process should be a debate on the entire field of proven and suspected misconduct by federal officials and agents under this president, and if judged to have been excessive by reasonable standards, to be grounds for removal, even if direct complicity cannot be shown.
Illegal Invasion, U.S. Constitution, Article 3, Section 8: "The Congress shall have Power To . . . " "To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions; To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the Militia, and for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the United States, reserving to the States respectively, the Appointment of the Officers, and the Authority of training the Militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress; . . ."
American Citizens ONLY Legally allowed to Vote!
Passed by Congress February 26, 1869. Ratified February 3, 1870.
The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude--
The Congress shall have the power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.
ARTICLE 2, Section 1:
Before he enter on the Execution of his Office, he shall take the following Oath or Affirmation:--"I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States."
ARTICLE 2, Section 4:
The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.
This is what they determine to do. NOT inforce portions of the U.S. Constitution such as Illegal Invasion, U.S. Constitution, Article 3, Section 8:, nor American Citizens ONLY! to Vote.
Passed by Congress February 26, 1869. Ratified February 3, 1870.
HOWEVER, they are trying to trump up charges (no pun intended) against former President Donald J. Trump to KEEP HIM FROM EVER HOLDING OFFICE AGAIN using this section of the U.S. Constitution!
ARTICLE 14, Section 3:
No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.
In JESUIT trained former Director of C.I.A. John Brennan's Private Sector Stint there is a Chinese Communist Party, CCP, Connection, Februrary 7, 2013 . . .
1 Kings 14:24
24 And there were also sodomites in the land: and they did according to all the abominations of the nations which the Lord cast out before the children of Israel..
23 And the light of a candle shall shine no more at all in thee; and the voice of the bridegroom and of the bride shall be heard no more at all in thee: for thy merchants were the great men of the earth; for by thy sorceries were all nations deceived.
( . . . for by thy SORCERIES (PHARMACIES) were all nations deceived.) SORCERIES in the Greek is the word: Pharmakeia which is translated into English as Pharmacy means the use of medicine, drugs or spells -- associated with WITCHCRAFT -- magic, sorcery, enchantment ...(Exodus 22:18; John 8:32; John 14:17; John 8:36. So, the antiChrist uses SORCERIES (PHARMACIES) to DECEIVE the whole world, takes over the world, to have the world (satan's family--those NOT BORN AGAIN, NOT CHRISTIAN,) worship him, by accepting his mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name. Revelation 13:17.)
32 And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.
6 Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me.
36 If the Son therefore shall make you free, ye shall be free indeed.
The world Communist takeover of the United States of America, aka: The Great Reset, led by the Chinese Communist Party, CCP; the CCP uniting BOTH left and right wings, even parts of our military and the F.B.I., the Democrats and "Republicans in Name Only, R.I.N.Os," Ukrainian's, Hong Kong agents, LGBT+a groups, including the gay Lincoln Project ALL organized and working as a united front. Antifa working together with Proud Boys and others, along with Labor Unions, tech companies, and weaponizing military technology against Americans using ALL of this against President Donald J. Trump to insure the Coup d'état . . .